No moaning. There's a pretty big difference between the classic ghost story of yesteryear, and modern day ghost stories. The classic moaning-ghost story, while chillingly and delightfully scary
sitting around a campfire, is not nearly sophisticated enough in this day and
age to satisfy a reader. But these days, even Moaning
Myrtle is not just another 'moaning' ghost who hangs in the first floor girl’s bathroom at Hogwarts. She has a
level of personality that makes her interesting. She’s in turn pouty, flirtatious, depressed and mischievous, especially when she joins Harry Potter in the prefects bathroom during his bubble bath and insists on trying to sneak a peek through the bubbles, saying, "Oh, hello Harry, long time - no - see, hmm."
I keep this in mind when writing about Franny Bishop, a
regular secondary character in my Indigo Eady Paranormal “Cozy” Mystery series.
Franny is a Victorian ghost and former madam. Her character is caring, forgetful and a bit funny as she tries to make sense of the modern
world. For instance, when she strew marbles on the floor to trip up the 'coppers' to give the kids enough time to escape the 'raid.' As a former madam, she has a past and more secrets than the house, the
senate and the oval office combined. But she’s clearly dead, so she has no worries,
right? Wrong. She worries about the
young investigators she’s taken under her wings, among other things. This
causes her to interfere. I’ve been told by more than one person that Franny is
their favorite character in the series.
No chain rattling. The classic ghost ‘haunts’ a house. It wanders down halls moaning,
making lights flicker, rattling chains, knocking things from shelves and
scaring the bejesus out of its residents. Again, good for campfires, but not
very interesting to readers for the long term. Franny doesn’t ‘haunt’ the house
where she resides. She lives there. It’s her home. If a chair is rocking
seemingly on its own, it’s because she’s sitting in it knitting. She does
normal things, just as a live person would. She has a life, so to speak.
Speak intelligently. The classic ghost who deigns to speak, tells you to get
out or die. They don’t really have much to say. If they do appear, they’ll
maybe just point, sort of like the ghost of Christmas yet to come in the classic Charles Dickens', A Christmas Carol. Sure, it’s creepy
and ominous, but creepy and ominous do not equal good plot. Classic ghosts are
fine for snippets or parts of stories; they add intrigue and the chilling
effect. But alone, they won’t carry a whole novel. A ghost character must have
fully developed lives and personalities. The more intriguing, the better.
Plausibility. Don’t believe in ghosts? You don’t have to. But even with
ghosts, the story has to be plausible. I write mysteries. When you’re solving
mysteries, how you come by your clues still has to make sense. Ghosts know a
lot about what’s going on in their worlds, but how they 'know' things still has
to make sense, too. It’s called the suspension of disbelief.
Ghosts can’t be omniscient and know everything. If they knew
everything, there would be no mystery, no intrigue and no story. They have to
come by their information the same way that the living do--through
investigation. No cop-outs just
because the character is a ghost.
Great post, Gwen! Love your rules on ghost writing. :)
ReplyDeleteThanks Cherie. Ghosties are characters too, so they have to have rules :)
ReplyDeleteLove this. My jury is out about ghosts, but I am keeping an open mind. And characters, all characters have to be three dimensional - regardless of which dimension they come from ...
ReplyDeleteGreat post!
ReplyDeleteI never thought of rules of writing ghost.
EC, Scrooge said something like, I do! I must! after Marley asked what evidence he'd have of the existence of ghosts other than his own senses. LOL, when faced with the likes of Marley, I'd have to believe, too!
ReplyDeleteDavid, these are just a few rules. Now, you can treat a ghost as omniscient, then find out they're lying...that really sort of throws chaos into the mix.
ReplyDeleteFantastic post, Gwen! I do believe in ghosts, but unfortunately I've never had an experience with one. My rules for writing ghosts are the same as yours. Ghosts are people too, or, er, once were!
ReplyDeleteSome good pointers for today's writer to satisfy today's reader.
ReplyDeleteNo, I don't believe in ghosts. I'm not above writing about them as a personality in a story. Especially in paranormal. I think any character you introduce, as a writer, has to have a personality and an arc. That would be true whether it's a fictitious creation or real person.
Sia McKye Over Coffee
Christine, you sound like me, LOL. Unfortunately, I haven't seen one either. But then, I'd be so freaking scared if I did...
ReplyDeleteSia, aha! A non-believer. But so real in fiction, right?
ReplyDeleteI do happen to believe in spirits, but as of yet I have not written a ghost tale. I want to, though! And I HAVE ghostwritten a book.
ReplyDeleteCatherine, I love to read your ghost tale, ghostwritten or not :)
ReplyDeleteJen, we're so glad you found us. I find writing ghosts so much fun. Sure you have rules, but they can do a lot of things the living characters can't do, LOL.
ReplyDeleteI love everything to do with ghosts, as I've always been interested in the paranormal. It was awesome to interview a couple of the members of the Ghost Hunters team (on SyFy)for an article I wrote.
ReplyDeleteBut I have to write about them. I think it's a pretty tough thing to do, so these rules come in handy if I ever get the courage to do so.
Jay, I've seen Ghost Hunters a few times. Sounds like such an exciting job.
ReplyDelete